Skip to content

Free Shipping. Lifetime Warranty. Apex Guarantee.

How to Take a Manual Blood Pressure

By

How to Take a Manual Blood Pressure: The Skill Every Clinician Should Master (But Many Don't)

Three months into my first nursing job, a patient's automatic blood pressure cuff kept alarming. The machine read 220/130, then 180/110, then an error, then 210/125. The patient looked uncomfortable but not acutely distressed. My preceptor walked over, wrapped a manual cuff around the patient's arm, placed her stethoscope over the brachial artery, and got 138/82. I never forgot that moment. My former position as an EMT had already instilled manual blood pressure readings into my muscle memory. In the back of a moving ambulance, there's no such thing as an automated cuff. You learn to do it manually, or you don't get useful numbers. But even with that foundation, I've continued to learn the nuances of this skill throughout my career. Sometimes those lessons come from unexpected places.

When a Simple Physical Taught Me Something Profound

I went for a routine physical a few years back. The medical assistant took my pressure with my arm dangling at my side while I sat on the exam table. The reading was 148/92. Something felt wrong. I asked if we could try it again with my arm supported at chest level. Same person, same cuff, two minutes later, my blood pressure was 118/76. Thirty points can be the difference between hypotension and hypertension. That's what arm position alone did to my reading. My actual blood pressure hadn't changed at all. Research confirms that arm position can create errors of 20-30 mmHg or more, with readings falsely elevated when the arm is below heart level.[1,2] And it made me think about every blood pressure I'd ever taken in the pediatric cardiac ICU. All those squirming toddlers and crying infants, arms flailing in whatever position I could manage while trying to get a reading. If I'm being honest, a good portion of those readings were probably nonsense. You do what you can when you're essentially wrestling a pediatric alligator, but technique can be all the difference. And when you can't control those variables, you need to acknowledge that your data might be suspect and consider a manual blood pressure measurement before providing interventions. This realization extends beyond just arm position. It's a reminder that blood pressure measurement, something we do dozens of times per shift, is surprisingly easy to get wrong. And the automated devices we've come to rely on? They fail in predictable ways that every clinician should understand.

Why Automated Devices Fail (And When You Need Manual Skills)

Automated cuffs use oscillometry. They detect vibrations in your arterial wall as the cuff deflates. For routine measurements on stable patients, they work fine. But throw in patient movement, atrial fibrillation, pressures at either extreme, or poor perfusion, and the machines show their limitations. Research shows the errors get particularly bad in patients with arrhythmias, obesity, or peripheral vascular disease.[6,7] The whole method relies on picking up subtle arterial wall motion. When that motion becomes irregular, dampened, or obscured, the algorithm can't make sense of what it's detecting. I've watched machines give wildly different readings on the same patient within minutes, readings that don't match the clinical picture at all. In these moments, you need to reach for a manual cuff and trust your ears. The manual auscultatory method, where you listen for Korotkoff sounds with a stethoscope, remains the gold standard for blood pressure measurement.[1,3] It's what automated devices are calibrated against. When automated readings seem off, when you're managing a hypertensive emergency, when your patient has significant arrhythmias, or when you need to assess for pulsus paradoxus or an auscultatory gap, manual measurements are the difference between beginner and expert clinical decisions.

Apex Stethoscopes

The Equipment: More Than Just a Cuff

You need three things: a sphygmomanometer (the cuff and gauge), a stethoscope, and the right environment. The cuff matters more than most clinicians realize. The bladder inside the cuff should encircle 80% of the arm circumference and cover about two-thirds of the distance between the shoulder and elbow.[1] A cuff that's too small gives falsely elevated readings. Too large a value gives falsely low readings. Most adults need a standard adult cuff (bladder about 12-13 cm wide and 35 cm long). Larger patients need a large adult or thigh cuff. Pediatric and small adult cuffs exist for a reason. Using the wrong size is one of the most common sources of measurement error.[11,12] Most blood pressure monitors provide the recommended arm circumference printed on the cuff. Your stethoscope's bell is traditionally recommended for blood pressure measurement because the Korotkoff sounds are low-frequency (below 100 Hz). However, many modern stethoscopes with tunable diaphragms work perfectly well with light pressure. The key is a good acoustic seal over the brachial artery. The environment matters too. Your patient should be seated with their back supported, feet flat on the floor, and arm supported at heart level. They should rest quietly for at least five minutes before measurement.[1,2] Talking, crossing legs, or having a full bladder can all elevate readings.

The Technique: Step by Step

Start with positioning, because this is where most people go wrong. Your patient's arm needs to be bare and supported on a table or armrest at heart level (roughly mid-sternum when they're sitting), with the palm facing up and the elbow slightly bent. My own doctor's office taught me exactly how much this matters. Arm below heart level? Your reading goes falsely high. Arm above? Falsely low. If you've ever worked in an ICU transducing arterial lines, you already know this concept. The transducer has to be precisely aligned with the phlebostatic axis. A blood pressure cuff works the same way. Palpate the brachial artery in the antecubital fossa. It's medial to the biceps tendon, and you should feel a strong pulse. This is where you'll place your stethoscope. Wrap the cuff snugly around the upper arm with the bladder centered over the brachial artery. The lower edge of the cuff should be about 2-3 cm (roughly one inch) above the antecubital fossa. If it's too close, it interferes with stethoscope placement. If it's too high, you lose accuracy.

Here's a step most people skip: estimate the systolic pressure first. Keep your fingers on the radial pulse and inflate the cuff. Note when the radial pulse disappears. This gives you a ballpark systolic pressure and tells you how high to inflate to during the actual measurement.[12] This technique came from my EMT training, and it's saved me countless times from inflating too low and missing the true systolic. Deflate the cuff completely and wait 30 seconds before proceeding. Wait 30 seconds before you start the actual measurement. Otherwise, venous congestion will throw off your numbers. Place your stethoscope over the brachial artery with a light touch. Too much pressure, and you'll obstruct the artery, which makes you hear sounds at lower pressures than they should be. I see this mistake all the time. The stethoscope needs to seal against the skin without denting it. Inflate the cuff rapidly to about 20-30 mmHg above where the radial pulse disappeared during your estimation. You shouldn't hear any sounds at this point because the artery is completely occluded. If you do listen to sounds, you haven't inflated enough.

Now comes the critical part: deflate slowly and steadily at 2-3 mmHg per second.[1,12] Too fast and you'll miss the sounds. Too slow causes venous congestion, falsely elevating diastolic pressure. This deflation rate takes practice to get consistent. Listen carefully. The systolic pressure is the first appearance of clear, repetitive tapping sounds (Korotkoff Phase I). These are created by turbulent blood flow through the partially occluded artery. The sounds will increase in intensity as you continue deflating, then become muffled, and finally disappear. Diastolic pressure is when the Korotkoff sounds completely disappear (Korotkoff Phase V). In some patients, especially children or pregnant women, you may hear sounds down to zero. In these cases, record the muffling point (Phase IV) as the diastolic pressure and document it. Continue listening until you've deflated completely. Some patients have an auscultatory gap in which sounds disappear between systole and diastole, then reappear.[12,14] If you didn't inflate high enough initially, you might catch sounds during the gap and mistake that for systolic pressure, significantly underestimating the true systolic value.

Apex Stethoscopes

Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

I've seen every one of these errors over the years, often by experienced clinicians who think they're doing it right. A preference for rounding to "nice" even numbers is common but should be avoided.[12,14] Clinicians tend to round to zero or five. If your readings always end in zero, you're probably rounding unconsciously. Be honest about what the gauge shows. Taking blood pressure over clothing may seem like a small shortcut, but it can add 10-40 mmHg to the systolic reading, depending on sleeve thickness.[9,12] Always measure on bare skin. Not waiting between measurements is another frequent error. If you need to repeat a measurement, wait at least one minute. Immediate remeasurement on the same arm can yield falsely elevated readings due to venous congestion. Talking raises blood pressure. Doesn't matter if it's the patient or the person taking the measurement. I've watched people carry on whole conversations while inflating the cuff, then scratch their heads when every reading comes back elevated. Which arm you use matters in some cases. Start with the right arm. If there's more than a 10 mmHg difference between sides, use whichever arm gave you the higher number for your subsequent measurements and write down that there was a discrepancy. When one arm consistently reads higher than the other, it may indicate vascular disease warranting investigation.

Practice Makes Consistent

Here's what I tell new nurses and medical students: you need to take at least 50 manual blood pressures on different people before you'll be truly comfortable with the skill. That sounds like a lot, but it goes quickly if you make a point of practicing. Start with healthy volunteers with normal blood pressures. Familiarize yourself with Korotkoff sounds. Pay attention to how clear they are, when they muffle, when they disappear. Once you're comfortable with normal, move on to patients with hypertension, atrial fibrillation, and obesity. The situations where it's harder. Practice your deflation rate with a stopwatch. Inflate the cuff, watch the second hand, and see if you can maintain a consistent 2-3 mmHg per second. It's harder than it seems at first. Compare your measurements with those of experienced clinicians or automated devices (on patients for whom the computerized device is reliable).

Bringing It Together

I'm guilty of reaching for the automated cuff first. It's hard to resist the efficiency of an automated cuff. But I've also been in enough situations where those machines left me hanging to know better than to trust them completely. The code where the patient's pressure was "error" for four straight minutes while we were pushing epi. The septic patient whose arm was so edematous that the oscillometric reading made no sense. Conditions like these are the equivalent of a static radio signal. Bad data is not an excuse to make a bad decision. Manual blood pressure isn't some nostalgic throwback to pre-digital medicine. It's a critical skill for when technology fails you, and technology fails more often than we like to admit. My EMT background drilled that lesson in early. You can't always count on your equipment working right, so you'd better know how to work without it. The technique itself isn't complicated. Proper cuff size, correct positioning, steady deflation rate, and honest reporting of what you hear. But simple doesn't mean easy. It takes real practice to get comfortable with the feel of it, to trust your ears when the sounds are subtle, to maintain that painfully slow deflation rate without thinking about it. Your stethoscope matters for clinical skills. At Apex, we design our stethoscopes specifically to pick up hard-to-hear sounds. The tunable diaphragm lets you hear exactly when turbulent flow starts and stops in that partially occluded artery. Clear acoustics mean the difference between guessing and knowing.

We offer eight color options because medicine isn't just about pure function. Your stethoscope becomes part of your professional identity. When you wear something around your neck for twelve-hour shifts, it should reflect who you are as a healthcare provider while maintaining absolute clinical performance.

References

  1. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Hypertension. 2005;45(1):142-161.
  2. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. 2017 ACC/AHA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Hypertension. 2018;71(6):e13-e115.
  3. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2010;15(1):23-38.
  4. Stergiou GS, Kollias A, Destounis A, et al. Automated blood pressure measurement in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2012;30(11):2074-2082.
  5. Frandsen E, Christiansen E, Rydahl M. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: validation and limitations. J Clin Hypertens. 2019;21(6):874-879.
  6. American Heart Association. The rules for accurate blood pressure measurement. Updated 2024.
  7. Mourad JJ, Girerd X, Boutouyrie P, et al. Importance of cuff size in blood pressure measurement. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2003;96(10):925-929.
  8. Beevers G, Lip GYH, O’Brien E. ABC of hypertension: blood pressure measurement. Part I. BMJ. 2001;322(7292):981-985.
  9. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation. 1993;88(5):2460-2470.