The Cost of Listening Shouldn't Be This High
We found four articles released this summer that captured our core philosophy as a company. A nursing program in Brazil. An engineering lab that built a five-dollar stethoscope. A cardiology service in Jordan that released real patient murmurs to the public. A global review of modern cardiac simulators. All four point to the same truth: we, as a community of healthcare professionals, have a responsibility to share knowledge and technology so that high-quality tools are available to everyone. Together, they show what becomes possible when teams prioritize reach over prestige. Build it locally. Share it openly. Make bedside listening teachable anywhere.
A Nursing Program Built Its Own Simulator From Local Parts
A team at the State University of Amazonas in Manaus, Brazil, developed a functional cardiopulmonary auscultation simulator between December 2023 and May 2024 using locally sourced, low-cost materials: an inanimate half male torso, an AM/FM radio, standard stethoscope earpieces, Bluetooth transmission, and libraries of normal and abnormal heart and lung sounds pulled from freely available online sources. The audio was synchronized with clinical case scenarios and could be delivered through a browser, tablet, or smartphone. No proprietary lab hardware required.
They did not just improvise a workaround. They formalized a repeatable process. The team documented a six-phase development pathway: planning and design, modeling and design, implementation, testing and validation, deployment and dissemination, and continuous improvement. That structure transforms the simulator from a clever one-off build into something other nursing programs can replicate, even in settings with limited funding and access to commercial simulation labs.
The goal was not to create a mannequin that makes noise. The goal was to improve clinical judgment. The authors argue that repeated, guided exposure to realistic heart and lung sounds helps students build mental models, recognize deterioration earlier, and make safer clinical decisions at the bedside. They frame auscultation training as part of patient safety. The barrier, they point out, is cost. Commercial high-fidelity cardiopulmonary manikins often cost tens of thousands of dollars, which means access to practice is limited by purchasing power rather than clinical need. Their conclusion is direct. The ability to assess breathing and circulation at the bedside should not depend on whether a school can afford premium hardware.
This work in Manaus proves a principle that matters beyond nursing education. When teams document their build process openly, they turn local solutions into distributed capability. That changes the conversation from "can we afford this" to "can we build this ourselves."
A Five-Dollar Digital Stethoscope That Works Better With a Hole in It
An engineering group published a 2025 study describing a digital stethoscope assembled from off-the-shelf parts for under five dollars in materials: an electret microphone capsule, a thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) 3D-printed housing, basic wiring, adhesive, and silicone sealant. Their stated goal was to design a high-quality, low-cost digital stethoscope that could be fabricated with only a soldering iron, a 3D printer, and commonly available components, so that accurate cardiopulmonary signal capture would not depend on proprietary hardware.
The most unexpected finding was acoustic. The best-performing design did not use a perfectly sealed diaphragm. It used a TPU diaphragm with a two-millimeter opening in the center. Classic acoustic stethoscope logic says you want the diaphragm to match the patient's skin so you do not lose energy at the interface. But in an electret microphone design the path is skin, then diaphragm, then an air gap, then the microphone. That extra air space changes how sound transfers through the system. The small center opening actually improved how pressure waves coupled into the air column, producing higher signal fidelity while still limiting ambient noise pickup. In some configurations, removing the diaphragm entirely performed nearly as well. This challenges long-held assumptions about what a digital stethoscope is supposed to look like and who is allowed to make one.
The testing was rigorous. The team evaluated 32 different sensor configurations, each run through more than 100 experiments using an acoustic phantom in a controlled sound booth while overlaying recorded hospital noise that ranged from quiet exam room conditions to busy hallway conditions. TPU outperformed PLA, PDMS, and resin-style materials in balancing clean physiological signal against background noise. Diaphragm thickness, from roughly 0.5 millimeters to 2 millimeters, had far less impact than material choice and that small center opening.
The implication is immediate. Reliable capture of lung and heart sounds in noisy, real-world environments is not inherently tied to a proprietary digital stethoscope with a premium price tag. If a sub-five-dollar assembly can stream clinically useful audio into a laptop or phone, then tele-auscultation, remote triage, and bedside documentation become realistic options for rural clinics, volunteer teams, mobile screening programs, and nursing programs without major capital budgets. The technology to support high-quality listening no longer requires institutional wealth.
What this engineering team did was strip away the assumption that quality audio capture requires expensive components. They tested relentlessly, documented their findings, and showed that thoughtful design at five dollars can outperform careless design at three hundred dollars. That distinction matters when you are trying to equip an entire clinic or train an entire cohort of students.
Real Patient Murmurs, Released to the Public
In 2025, clinicians and researchers at King Abdullah University Hospital in northern Jordan published a labeled dataset of pathological and normal heart sounds in Data in Brief and released the full audio openly through Mendeley Data. The dataset contains 399 recordings from 104 participants and covers aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, tricuspid regurgitation, and normal cardiac sounds. Recordings were captured at the standard cardiac listening posts, including aortic, mitral, and tricuspid areas, while patients were seated in a quiet clinical setting. Every diagnosis was confirmed by a cardiologist using echocardiography before the sound clip was accepted into the dataset, which means each recording is tied to verified pathology rather than assumed pathology.
This resource is valuable in two different ways. First, for clinical education. Learners can hear real systolic jets and diastolic leakage from real patients with confirmed valve disease, not idealized simulator loops. They can compare tricuspid regurgitation and mitral regurgitation at their proper auscultation landmarks. They can repeat those sounds as often as they need without waiting for the right patient case on rounds. Second, for signal analysis and research. All audio was captured using the same device, a 3M Littmann 3200 electronic stethoscope, under consistent conditions. Each file is annotated with lesion type, anatomic site, age, and sex. That consistency makes the dataset suitable for training murmur detection models, denoising algorithms, and early escalation tools that can flag findings that sound like clinically significant regurgitation.
The access model matters. Instead of locking cardiac audio behind paywalled platforms or closed institutional databases, this team in Jordan released clinically confirmed pathology to the public. That means a nursing student in a rural program can study the sound of tricuspid regurgitation with the same level of fidelity as a cardiology fellow at a major academic center. The one limitation the authors acknowledge is class balance. Aortic regurgitation is less represented than mitral and tricuspid regurgitation, which is important to understand when you are building teaching material or training machine learning systems.
What makes this dataset different from other published sound libraries is not just the quality of the recordings or the echo confirmation. It is the choice to release it openly. That choice directly challenges the idea that clinical audio is institutional property instead of shared educational infrastructure. When a team releases verified pathology for anyone to use, they are making a statement about what auscultation education should look like.
Where Simulation Technology Actually Lives
A July 2025 systematic review in Bioengineering analyzed 69 recent patents from 2020 through 2024 and 52 scientific studies focused on cardiac auscultation simulators. The review mapped how these simulators are constructed, which technologies they rely on, how they are being validated, and where they are being developed. The findings confirm a pattern many clinicians already feel. Simulation technology is advancing quickly. We now see better placement of sound at specific intercostal spaces, integration of heart sound recordings with ECG tracings for context, and remote and connected training platforms. Access and deployment, however, are still uneven.
Most of the systems described in the review are being engineered to medical device standards rather than classroom prop standards. The majority of included studies reported at least 90 percent compliance with ISO 13485:2016, the international quality management standard for medical devices. That level of compliance means these simulators are being built for consistency, reproducibility, and documented safety. The review also found that pairing phonocardiogram data with ECG improved diagnostic performance, including sensitivity and overall discrimination, compared to relying solely on sound. That supports a core principle of bedside training. Heart sounds are not supposed to be taught in isolation. They are supposed to be taught in a clinical context.
But the access gap is clear. High-fidelity simulators are concentrated in high-income countries such as the United States, Japan, China, and the Netherlands. Lower- and middle-income countries are underrepresented in the literature, often appearing only once. The authors note that these systems are expensive to build and are typically located in centralized simulation labs, rather than on the wards where new clinicians actually practice. The review directly calls for lower-cost simulators built from accessible materials, such as 3D-printed housings and off-the-shelf electronics, and it advocates for broader collaboration to ensure that auscultation training is not reserved for the most well-funded institutions. The conclusion is blunt. The capability exists. The limitation is distribution and cost, not engineering.
This review is significant because it addresses the problem directly. We have the technical capability to create excellent simulations. The gap is not innovation. The gap is in distribution. The barrier is not what we can build. The barrier is who can access it and where it actually lives in clinical training.
What This Means for Bedside Practice
Four different groups reached the same conclusion from four different directions.
A nursing program in the Amazon built and validated a cardiopulmonary auscultation trainer using readily available parts and documented the process in a way that other schools can follow.
An engineering lab demonstrated that a five-dollar digital stethoscope, constructed with an electret microphone and a 3D-printed TPU housing, can capture clinically useful heart and lung sounds in noisy real-world conditions. Furthermore, careful acoustic design can sometimes perform better with less material, rather than more.
A cardiology service in Jordan recorded real patients with valve regurgitation, labeled each murmur by lesion and auscultation site, confirmed each diagnosis with echocardiography, and released the entire dataset openly, allowing anyone to learn from it or build upon it.
A global review of simulator technology revealed that high-fidelity auscultation training is advancing in sophistication; however, access remains concentrated in wealthier systems, and it calls for cost-focused designs that can operate where care occurs, not just in showcase labs.
The message is straightforward, and it defines how we approach our work. Bedside listening is an essential clinical practice. The ability to teach it, practice it, record it, and act on it should not depend on whether you trained in a high-budget program. The technology exists. The barrier is distribution. These four studies remind us that the barrier is not insurmountable. It is a design choice, and professionals worldwide are already making different choices.
Ready to upgrade your daily listening? Explore our full range of stethoscopes designed for precise cardiac auscultation.
